Car Dealership Employee Sues After Being Demoted, Injured, Denied Accommodation, and Fired for Seeking Workers Compensation
Car Dealership Employee Sues After Being Demoted, Injured, Denied Accommodation, and Fired for Seeking Workers Compensation
Case Summary
Michael J. Diaz was hired as a Sales Manager at Mahwah Honda in the fall of 2020 and demoted two months later, with management citing his replacement's ability to speak Spanish as the reason despite it not being a job requirement. When he complained about illegal paycheck deductions and refused to sign an arbitration agreement, he was singled out. After being injured in a work-related auto accident in April 2021, the company delayed his workers compensation treatment, forced him back to work prematurely, cut his pay by nearly 60%, and fired him for job abandonment while he was still under his doctor's care. He filed suit against Mahwah Honda and three named managers for disability discrimination, wage violations, workers compensation retaliation, CEPA, and wrongful discharge.
Background
Michael J. Diaz was hired as a Sales Manager at Mahwah Honda in the fall of 2020. On January 25, 2021, just two months into his employment, he was demoted to salesman despite his excellent performance. His Sales Manager position was given to a friend and former co-worker of Desk Manager Matt O'Donnell. When Mr. Diaz complained about the demotion, he was told by management that they were "going in a different direction." Management later told him the reason for his demotion was that his replacement "speaks Spanish" — though Spanish had not been a requirement of the job when Mr. Diaz was hired. The demotion reduced his pay from approximately $13,000–$14,000 per month to roughly $9,000 per month.
Shortly after the demotion, Mr. Diaz received a paycheck that was $200 short. When he inquired, he was told he had been paid as a Sales Manager in error. He objected and requested documentation of the basis for the deduction — none was provided, and the deductions continued. After he complained about the illegal wage deductions, the company singled him out and began pressuring him to sign an arbitration agreement. To his knowledge, no other employees were required to sign one. Mr. O'Donnell told him he would lose his job if he did not sign. When he complained to the General Sales Manager, Alex Brischler, he was told "You have to," implying his job depended on signing. When he objected to Mr. O'Donnell, Mr. O'Donnell replied, "Well, I don't know where you're going to work then." After Mr. Diaz continued to refuse, the pressure eventually stopped.
On April 10, 2021, Mr. Diaz was rear-ended while traveling between dealerships for work and sustained back, neck, and shoulder injuries. He promptly notified Mahwah Honda. The company delayed in providing workers compensation information, benefits, and treatment. After retaining a workers compensation attorney, Mr. Diaz received authorized medical treatment and was placed out of work by two doctors over the following weeks. In early June 2021, despite his workers compensation doctor having ordered him to remain out of work, Mr. Diaz received an email from Head of Human Resources Pedro Gaudencio claiming the doctor had "changed his diagnosis" and directing him to return to light duty on June 12, 2021. When Mr. Diaz contacted the doctor, the doctor said his return was "out of his hands" but sympathized with him.
Upon returning on June 12, Mr. Diaz was placed in a back room answering phones and told he would be paid only $20 per hour — a reduction of nearly 60% from his Sales Manager pay. After working through significant pain for several days, Mr. Diaz left work on June 14 and was again placed out of work by the workers compensation doctor following a reevaluation on June 16, 2021. He attempted daily contact with Mr. Gaudencio and Mr. Brischler seeking a return-to-work date. His calls and texts went unanswered for over a week. Mr. Brischler denied receiving any messages and Mr. Gaudencio claimed he had purchased a new phone. In a conversation at the dealership on June 23, Mr. Gaudencio represented that "everything looks good, we should be bringing you back soon, probably today or tomorrow." Later that day, Mr. Diaz's texts to Mr. Gaudencio stopped delivering via iMessage and his calls went straight to voicemail — he concluded Mr. Gaudencio had blocked his number. On June 30, 2021, Mr. Brischler called Mr. Diaz and fired him for "job abandonment" — without any prior notice that he was required to return to work.
After his termination, Mahwah Honda contested Mr. Diaz's unemployment benefits by falsely claiming he had violated a company policy. Mr. Diaz appealed. An unemployment hearing officer found in his favor, determining that no company policy had been violated and that the company had failed to even identify a relevant policy. His unemployment benefits were delayed by approximately four months as a result.
Legal Claims Filed
Michael J. Diaz, by and through his attorneys at Mark | Kleinfeldt, filed a complaint against Mahwah Honda, Alex Brischler, Pedro Gaudencio, and Matt O'Donnell asserting the following claims.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda terminated his employment because of his disability — the injuries sustained in the April 10, 2021 work accident — in violation of the NJLAD's prohibition on disability discrimination.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda failed to provide a reasonable accommodation for his disability, specifically a medical leave of absence and an ergonomic chair as recommended by his physician, and failed to engage in any interactive process to explore alternatives, in violation of the NJLAD.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda terminated his employment in retaliation for requesting a reasonable medical leave of absence and workplace accommodation supported by a doctor's note, in violation of the NJLAD.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Alex Brischler and Pedro Gaudencio personally aided and abetted the NJLAD violations by interfering with his exercise of rights under the law, subjecting them to individual liability.
Mr. Diaz alleged that his termination was in retaliation for his objections to Mahwah Honda's unlawful wage deductions and its attempts to coerce him into signing an arbitration agreement — conduct he reasonably believed violated New Jersey law and public policy — in violation of CEPA.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda willfully withheld his regular wages without his authorization in violation of New Jersey's Wage and Hour Law, entitling him to treble damages and attorney's fees.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda knowingly and unlawfully deducted from, withheld, and diverted his wages without authorization in violation of the New Jersey Wage Payment Act, entitling him to the full amount of wages due plus 200% liquidated damages and attorney's fees.
Mr. Diaz alleged that his termination violated the clear mandate of New Jersey public policy by firing him for objecting to illegal conduct and for having been injured in and sought compensation for a workplace accident, in violation of the standard established in Pierce v. Ortho Pharmaceutical, 84 N.J. 58 (1980).
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda terminated his employment in retaliation for his having reported a workplace injury, sought authorized workers compensation treatment, and exercised his rights under New Jersey's workers compensation statute, in violation of N.J.S.A. 34:15-39.1.
Mr. Diaz alleged that Mahwah Honda retaliated against him after his termination by falsely representing to the unemployment office that he had violated a company policy — a claim the unemployment hearing officer rejected — causing a four-month delay in his receipt of unemployment benefits he was entitled to receive.
Related Contacts
What This Case Illustrates
New Jersey law provides overlapping protections for employees who are injured at work, request medical accommodations, and object to illegal conduct by their employer — and that an employer who retaliates on multiple fronts can face liability on multiple legal theories simultaneously. It also illustrates that post-employment conduct matters: an employer who contests unemployment benefits in bad faith to continue punishing a former employee may face additional legal consequences for that conduct.
If something similar happened to you, take the next step.
Could This Apply to Your Situation?
If you experienced something similar, New Jersey law may protect you. Learn how these claims work and what your rights are.