School Secretary Sues Paterson Public Schools After Being Forced to Retire During COVID-19 Pandemic
School Secretary Sues Paterson Public Schools After Being Forced to Retire During COVID-19 Pandemic
Case Summary
Shelly T. Black was a school secretary who had worked for the Paterson Public Schools since 2005. After suffering a heart attack in 2019, she requested to continue working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic due to her documented heart condition and her doctors' recommendations. The district denied her accommodation request without engaging in any interactive process and required her to return to in-person work, leaving her no choice but to retire at age 64 to protect her health. She filed suit against the district and four named administrators for disability discrimination, constructive discharge, and retaliation under the NJLAD and CEPA.
Background
Shelly T. Black was employed as a school secretary for the Paterson Public Schools from September 26, 2005. She never had any disciplinary or performance issues during her employment. On April 19, 2019, she suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized for two and a half days, after which she took approximately five months of medical leave to recover. On May 8, 2019, the Director of Employee Services reprimanded her for taking the medical leave and cited her attendance record. The district subsequently granted her an ADA accommodation leave and later approved an abbreviated schedule to allow her to attend cardiac therapy sessions prescribed by her doctor.
During the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in the spring and summer of 2020, all Paterson Public Schools staff — including Ms. Black — worked remotely without issue. In August 2020, the district directed staff to return to in-person work on a hybrid schedule beginning September 1, 2020. Ms. Black submitted a doctor's note stating that she "has a chronic medical condition and she is susceptible to COVID-19 exposure and other illnesses" and that "it is medically necessary for her to continue working from home." A second physician also wrote that she "would be considered a higher risk patient and she should ensure all precautions are undertaken to mitigate risk at work."
In a letter to the Superintendent, Ms. Black also raised concerns that the district's return-to-work directive violated Governor Murphy's executive order limiting indoor gatherings and contradicted the district's own August 12, 2020, resolution mandating virtual instruction through at least November 1. She invoked her collective bargaining agreement rights and stated she remained ready and willing to work remotely.
Her ADA accommodation request was initially denied because she had not completed the required forms. After submitting the completed forms with her physicians' documentation, the district denied her request on September 21, 2020, stating that her secretarial duties were essential for the start of the school year and could not be performed remotely — despite having permitted her and other staff to work remotely and acknowledging in the same denial letter that she could continue to work remotely on designated remote days. The district also acknowledged that other secretaries who did not have medical disabilities had not requested remote work accommodations for medical reasons.
The district never engaged Ms. Black in an interactive process to determine what accommodations could reasonably be provided. On November 22, 2020, Ms. Black wrote to the Director of Employee Services that she was forced to retire prematurely on December 31, 2020, to preserve her health. In her letter she wrote: "It deeply saddens and concerns me that after several employees have been affected by this deadly virus and good friend (Eastside Administrator) who passed that I would not be considered the minimum contest to work from home while having a severe health condition." She was forced into retirement at age 64. It was later discovered that school staff continued to work remotely through the end of the spring 2021 school year.
Legal Claims Filed
Shelly T. Black, by and through her attorneys at Mark | Kleinfeldt, filed a complaint against Paterson Public Schools, Eileen F. Shafer, Lynette Gonzalez, Karen Dever, and Luis M. Rojas Jr., asserting the following claims.
Ms. Black alleged that Paterson Public Schools failed to provide her with a reasonable accommodation for her disability — specifically, the ability to continue working remotely during the COVID-19 pandemic as recommended by her physicians — and failed to engage in any interactive process to explore alternative accommodations, in violation of the NJLAD. The district's failure to accommodate was alleged to be the sole factor in her forced retirement.
Ms. Black alleged that Paterson Public Schools subjected her to conditions so intolerable — requiring her to choose between her health and her job in the face of a deadly pandemic — that a reasonable person in her position would have been compelled to resign, constituting a constructive discharge in violation of the NJLAD.
Ms. Black alleged that the individual defendants — Shafer, Gonzalez, Dever, and Rojas — each personally participated in, furthered, and aided and abetted the discriminatory conduct against her in violation of the NJLAD, subjecting them to individual liability.
Ms. Black alleged that she engaged in protected whistleblowing activity when she reported to the district that its return-to-work directive violated Governor Murphy's executive order and the district's own resolution. The district's denial of her accommodation and constructive discharge of her employment was in retaliation for that protected activity, in violation of CEPA.
Related Contacts
What This Case Illustrates
New Jersey law requires employers to engage in a good-faith interactive process when an employee requests a disability accommodation — and that an employer who refuses to explore any alternatives, denies an accommodation that had previously been provided without hardship, and forces an employee to choose between her health and her job may be liable for constructive discharge under the NJLAD. It also illustrates that an employee who reports that her employer's conduct violates the law is protected from retaliation under CEPA, even when that reporting takes the form of an internal complaint.
If something similar happened to you, take the next step.
Could This Apply to Your Situation?
If you experienced something similar, New Jersey law may protect you. Learn how these claims work and what your rights are.